| To: | Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs() |
| From: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 May 2012 16:36:04 +0200 |
| Cc: | Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <x49sjf6vml5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <jognqm$o21$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FABF01E.7080303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FAD18D4.3090102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <x49sjf6vml5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On 05/11/2012 04:06 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
>> index e453924..84da885 100644
>> --- a/fs/bio.c
>> +++ b/fs/bio.c
>> @@ -505,9 +505,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone);
>> int bio_get_nr_vecs(struct block_device *bdev)
>> {
>> struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>> - return min_t(unsigned,
>> + int nr_pages;
>
> Looks like a corrupt patch.
It's fine, I think you are misreading the added and removed lines :-)
--
Jens Axboe
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs(), Bernd Schubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs(), Jens Axboe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs(), Bernd Schubert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs(), Jeff Moyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |