Re: [PATCH] xfstests: make 275 xfs specific.

[Tao Ma <tm@xxxxxx>]

On 05/06/2012 07:37 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:07:09PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> In my test with ext4, 275 can't pass because ext4
>> can create a 8k file in the end not like what xfs
>> does. So make this test case xfs only for now.
> 
> It's not an XFS specific test - it's a test that is supposed to test
> POSIX write behaviour. i.e. if the filesystem is full, and then you
> free 4k of space, then an 8k write should only be able to write 4k,
> yes?
Yes, but it doesn't work as expected for ext4.
> 
> So doesn't a failure on ext4 indicate that there's something wrong
> with ext4 (either it's ENOSPC detection or the short write
> handling), not the test?
Actually in my test, ext4 can create the file with 8K file size, not a
short write. I haven't looked into it yet. But AFAICS, if we have an
ext4 volume with 8k cluster size, a 4k file can occupy a 8k cluster and
the final write of 8k will succeed instead of the short write.

Thanks
Tao