| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: kill XBF_LOCK |
| From: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:56 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120411200729.GJ28816@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1334052213-26870-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1334052213-26870-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F844B02.2030301@xxxxxxx> <20120410222027.GR18323@dastard> <20120411200729.GJ28816@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 04/11/12 15:07, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:20:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:The reason I ask, the sources that I have for xfs_buf_get() seems to still have a "goto no_buffer" for the failed xfs_buf_allocate_memory() call and this patch removes that call. I did not find anything in the 8 buf clean-up series that would alter this area.I'm sure I posted it previously. Let me update all the reviewed-by tags and I'll resend the entire series....I think Mark meant the patch to fix the error handling for failed allocation, which needs to be redone to only insert the buffer into the rbtree once it's fully set up. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs That is correct. The series in general looked good to me. --Mark Tinguely. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Introduce test case 285 for project quota negative test collections, Jeff Liu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] disable tags in post-receive hook, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: kill XBF_LOCK, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: kill XBF_LOCK, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |