| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS status update for January 2012 |
| From: | Richard Ems <richard.ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:53:05 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <4F4B7408.8020706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120225120216.GA21721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B5CB3.8090107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B7408.8020706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120215 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 02/27/2012 01:16 PM, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > Hello Richard, > > Here I am running gentoo with kernel 3.2 > In the 2.6 era I always mounted my xfs file systems with the delaylog > option, is this still necessary? Is delaylog now default? Hi Coert, I am running now 3.2.7 and the output of " grep xfs /proc/mounts " shows delaylog as being in use. I didn't put this option in /etc/fstab, so I think it must be default now. But surely a developer can give a much better answer to your question. Richard -- Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cape Horn Engineering S.L. C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso 46011 Valencia Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924 http://www.cape-horn-eng.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: creating a new 80 TB XFS, Richard Ems |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Soft lockup problem, Gerard Saraber |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS status update for January 2012, Coert Waagmeester |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS status update for January 2012, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |