| To: | Marcos Mello <marcosfrm@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Placing the root partition on an XFS filesystem is not supported |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:50:17 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <loom.20120203T152753-631@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <loom.20120129T133929-288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F2B02C4.8070903@xxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20120203T152753-631@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 |
On 2/3/12 8:39 AM, Marcos Mello wrote: > Eric Sandeen <sandeen <at> sandeen.net> writes: > >> >> In general there is no problem with xfs on a root partition. However, the > installer >> may not make it easy or available for you. >> >> (I never use xfs for /boot though, I don't trust grub enough for that > honestly). >> >> -Eric > > Same thing on Fedora 16. Let's hope some day Anaconda will change that. F16 prevents it? I didn't see it in the upstream tree. That should not be so. :/ > About GRUB with a XFS /boot the problem was with GRUB Lagacy, wasn't it? > Or GRUB2 is still buggy? I have no idea, actually. I delved into grub a bit, it was disturbing enough that I have not tried to look at grub2. :) -Eric > Marcos > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Performance problem - reads slower than writes, Brian Candler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Performance problem - reads slower than writes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Placing the root partition on an XFS filesystem is not supported, Marcos Mello |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Placing the root partition on an XFS filesystem is not supported, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |