| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: incremental dump directory selection |
| From: | Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:32:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20111028093752.GB23069@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1319214933-16276-1-git-send-email-wkendall@xxxxxxx> <20111028093752.GB23069@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080502) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Bill Kendall wrote:When doing incremental backups, xfsdump does a recursive scan through the filesystems to determine the proper set of unchanged directories to include in the dump in order to make the dump self-contained (allowing files to be restored from this dump without applying the base dumps first). For high-inode count filesystems, the recursive scan may consume a significant portion of the backup time. This patch adds a -D option which causes xfsdump to skip the recursive scan. Unchanged directories will not be dumped, so the base dump(s) will have to be loaded prior to restoring files from the dump. When restoring files from such a dump, a message is issued to alert the user that files may end up in the orphanage if the base dump(s) has not been applied.Any chance you could submit some xfstests coverage for this feature? Sure, will do. Bill |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 42/45] xfs: on-stack delayed write buffer lists, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: fix metadata restore on split files, Bill Kendall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: incremental dump directory selection, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Webmail Update Team., Caroles Crafts Batley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |