| To: | aelder@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: handle dump files with checksum bug |
| From: | Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:17:04 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1316791615.2879.50.camel@doink> |
| References: | <1316781902-19803-1-git-send-email-wkendall@xxxxxxx> <1316791615.2879.50.camel@doink> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
On 09/23/2011 10:26 AM, Alex Elder wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 07:45 -0500, Bill Kendall wrote:+ mlog( MLOG_NORMAL | MLOG_WARNING, _( + "extattr header checksum " + "could not be verified\n") );Is there any way to slightly change this message so that someone who saw it would feel like "I got this warning but it's really OK"? If I were a user and got this message I would be a little afraid that it meant something was really wrong with what got restored--possibly the whole thing, or just on some unnamed file, never to be found. Maybe "old-style extattr header checksums being ignored". (I'm sure you can come up with better, I just like to offer *something* when I suggest a change.) I more or less like what you've suggested. How about this: "ignoring old-style extattr header checksums" Bill |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v3.1-rc1-69-ge49f565, xfs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH v2] xfsdump: handle dump files with checksum bug, Bill Kendall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: handle dump files with checksum bug, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/2 v3] commit.rc: Add helper for math operation using bc, Lukas Czerner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |