Re: [PATCH 0/2 v8] XFS TESTS: ENOSPC Punch Hole Test

[Allison Henderson <achender@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/18/2011 03:09 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 16:52 -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> > This patch set adds the ENOSPC test that was used for ext4 punch hole testing.
> > This test will verify that a hole can be punched even when the disk is full.
> > Reserved blocks should be used to complete the operation when there is not 
> > blocks
> > to further fragment the file.
> >
> > Because punching a hole does not always require extra blocks, there needs to
> > be several iterations of punching holes, and then filling the file system to 
> > 100%
> > usage before it is forced to grow the tree in order to handle the fragmentation.
> > The growing of the tree is what would cause ENOSPC if not for the use of 
> > reserved blocks.
> I have reviewed both of your updated patches.  They
> both look good to me.  I'll give it another day or
> two for others to comment if they like, but unless
> someone suggests changes I'll commit this for you.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder<aelder@xxxxxxx>
Alrighty then, sounds good to me.  Thanks Alex!

Allison Henderson