Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim

xfs

Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim

To:	hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:35:38 +0900
Cc:	david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20110616113321.GA22422@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<1306998067-27659-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110616113321.GA22422@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10

(2011/06/16 20:33), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Can we get some comments from the MM folks for patches 1-3?  Those look
> like some pretty urgent fixes for really dumb shrinker behaviour.

Yeah, I'm reviewing today. I'm sorry delayed it. So, generically they are
pretty good to me. thanks Dave. So, I have a few minor comments and I'll post
it when my review is finished. (Maybe some hour later).

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 09/12] inode: remove iprune_sem, (continued) [PATCH 09/12] inode: remove iprune_sem, Dave Chinner [PATCH 10/12] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations, Dave Chinner [PATCH 08/12] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 08/12] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure, Al Viro Re: [PATCH 08/12] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 08/12] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH 08/12] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure, Al Viro Re: [PATCH 08/12] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure, Al Viro [PATCH 12/12] xfs: make use of new shrinker callout for the inode cache, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim, KOSAKI Motohiro <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH]: [xfstests] Make the requirement of projid32bit explicit in test 244, Chandra Seetharaman
Next by Date:	Warning: AG size is a multiple of stripe width?, Gim Leong Chin
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:	Keeping track of your usage‏, Hatch, Amy - FCH
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]