| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect |
| From: | Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:58:32 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110607115441.GA4653@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4DEE0EA4.9090002@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110607115441.GA4653@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
Sorry i can't. I'm not a kernel hacker. But i think a real bug / showstopper should be fixed in a longterm stable kernel.it seems that a bug was backported into the latest 2.6.32 longterm stable kernel. Now the patch "XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect" needs to get backported to 2.6.32. Who can help? Who is responsible?For -stable releases no one really is. If you want to help you can backport it and send it to the stable mailinglist. Redhat seems to have fixed it on it's own: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642680 Sadly they haven't provided a patch. Greets Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fwd: [XFSTEST Add Fallocate Punch Hole Tests 1/3 v4] Add Punch Hole to FSX, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |