| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:17:13 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <4D40EB2F.2050809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4D40C8D1.8090202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard> <4D40EB2F.2050809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Mark Lord put forth on 1/26/2011 9:49 PM: > agcount=7453 That's probably a bit high Mark, and very possibly the cause of your problems. :) Unless the disk array backing this filesystem has something like 400-800 striped disk drives. You said it's a single 2TB drive right? The default agcount for a single drive filesystem is 4 allocation groups. For mdraid (of any number of disks/configuration) it's 16 allocation groups. Why/how did you end up with 7452 allocation groups? That can definitely cause some performance issues due to massively excessive head seeking, and possibly all manner of weirdness. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount, Mark Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount, Mark Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount, Mark Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount, Mark Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |