| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: able to mount a fs, unable to repair it |
| From: | Richard Scobie <r.scobie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:47:42 +1300 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 |
Emmanuel Florac wrote: > However, a reliable RAID-5 is probably safer than an experimental > RAID-6 overall.Looking at the 2.6.29.1 kernel running on this machine, the only md RAID mode marked as experimental is RAID-10. I have no experience using Xen, but have used md RAID6 extensively in heavily loaded situations for over three years without problems. Regards, Richard |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfssyncd and disk spin down, Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: able to mount a fs, unable to repair it, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/5] percpu_counter: fix test in __percpu_counter_add_unless_lt(), Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |