> hm that's a little confusing, what it means is it looked
> in /proc/mounts and did not find anything, or so it thought.
I agree that it's confusing, while there are xfs mounted rw in /proc/mounts
> As a result of:
>
> 89e4b5bd5615edc584a5111c86f12b4f89f8dd7d xfs_fsr: use /proc/mounts if
> available
I "quickly and dirty" tried to use /etc/mtab instead, but the result is
the same. Even tried some old version (3.0.3), which uses mtab and it's
the same.
> What does your /proc/mounts show?
it shows the lines included in the original e-mail, just here it is
wrapped, i.e. for the not working case:
>> ...
>> /dev/mapper/root / xfs
>> rw,noatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,noquota 0 0
>> ...
and for working case:
>> ...
>> /dev/root / xfs
>> rw,noatime,attr2,delaylog,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,noquota 0 0
>> /dev/mapper/encrypted /home xfs
>> rw,noatime,attr2,delaylog,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,sunit=512,swidth=1536,noquota
>> 0 0
>> ...
Honza
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|