| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: performance |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:47:39 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <20101130075109.GN13830@dastard> |
| References: | <AANLkTi=u8dX0ehPN3Rv3FQ+84htY3AYEv0eboGgC7_qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101129001112.GA28672@dastard> <AANLkTikom6jpkuZquTfinGpaqz4Gp0y8niYN7yWQgmzj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101129015937.GB28672@dastard> <AANLkTikw086Z_66cz_U-EdFQx14TXP6XmiG-KyLN4BLo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=-y0v4MzyU+qWPmvazouDu0N3gqSvVTU1z4Gke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CF33D0F.6080404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101130042913.GB3556@dastard> <4CF48299.2030204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101130075109.GN13830@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
Dave Chinner put forth on 11/30/2010 1:51 AM: > No, it detected the RAID configuration. 16 AGs is the default for a > RAID device, 4 AGs is used if RAID is not detected. So, as a general rule of thumb, one should have as many AGs as the maximum number of potential writers, assuming the underlying storage device can handle the I/O? For instance, on a quad socket 12 core Magny Cours system with 48 total cores, if one has an application with 48 writing threads, one should have at least 48 AGs? And if the the default is 4 AGs per physical disk, does this mean one should have at least 12 drives in the stripe width? I'm thinking of SRDs in my example, not SSDs. And obviously if these are heavy writing threads, a single 2 GHz core can easily outrun a single disk, so one would probably want at least 48 SRDs if not 96 in the stripe. Yes? Obviously there are potentially many other factors that may come into play in this equation. I'm just looking for a general formula one should use as a baseline template, as 16 AGs doesn't seem to be enough for any application, core/thread count, SRD RAID configuration. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfstests: getfacl -n unsupported in older acl package, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 01/10] xfs: improve mapping type check in xfs_vm_writepage, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: performance, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: performance, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |