| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes |
| From: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:52:40 +0200 |
| Cc: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101012102954.GQ4681@dastard> |
| References: | <AANLkTinwnOm0V=9WwbXiUGFnyjCwT3GUHo0hiQahQNUV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101008225146.GJ4681@dastard> <AANLkTikLyEuSoFRVwirKLws97Vemz4ScNHOqu2Jc5sWR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101011223507.GB32255@dastard> <4CB3B964.40109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101012102954.GQ4681@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20100914 SUSE/2.0.8-24.1 SeaMonkey/2.0.8 |
Dave Chinner wrote: >> If so, could/should the OP specify anything >> during the mkfs.xfs reformat that may help alleviate or mitigate his >> problem in the future? > > No. These problems usually appear in filesystems that have run at > greater than 85-90% full for extended periods of time without being > emptied at all. Once you start to free up space, it naturally > defragments itself, but if you never free up any significant amount > of space in the filesytesm, this cannot occur and so fragmentation > just keeps getting worse.... I'm curious if using noikeep mount option has any effect on free space fragmentation? jan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Fix some file permission., Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |