| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS over LVM over md RAID |
| From: | Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:52:25 +1200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <201009100225.55562@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <4C89668E.6010800@xxxxxxxxxxx> <201009100225.55562@xxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 |
Michael Monnerie wrote: FWIW, a stripe set of 256k means you do read/write 256k from a single drive on each I/O, then the next 256k from the next drive. I hope you have very few small accesses and mostly very large files. If you'd use a database on that system it would crawl... Mostly > 2MB and multi GB. Regards, Richard |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC PATCH] fs,xfs: Use __GFP_MOVABLE for XFS buffers, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS over LVM over md RAID, Richard Scobie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS over LVM over md RAID, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS over LVM over md RAID, Richard Scobie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |