| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Alignment size? |
| From: | Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:18:28 +0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100813113915.GD10429@dastard> |
| Openpgp: | id=804465C5 |
| Organization: | Telecom Service, JSC |
| References: | <4C64715F.8060000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100812234911.GC10429@dastard> <4C64E52E.2060806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100813113915.GD10429@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100619 Icedove/3.0.5 |
13.08.2010 15:39, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:24:46AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> And a related question, -- is there a way to create >> xfs fs with the right sector size? The filesystem >> were ok in years, not only on this machine, and I'm >> quite afraid to replace it with something else (e.g. >> ext4) in a hurry without good prior testing. > > # mkfs.xfs -s <size> .... > > if you want to set it manually. YOu shouldn't need to with any > relatively recent mkfs.xfs... Um. It appears that mkfs.xfs ignores -s size=512 on this raid5 array, and silently creates a filesystem with 4096 sector size, regardless of various -s size=nn and -s log=mm options. This is xfsprogs 3.1.2-1 (debian squeeze package). So the question stands... Thanks! /mjt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdump-3.0.4 problems, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Alignment size?, Michael Tokarev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Alignment size?, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Alignment size?, Michael Tokarev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |