| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 4k sector drives |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:41:10 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20100723104733.GA12413@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <201007211333.48363.eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx> <201007230809.28111@xxxxxx> <20100723095832.GA23174@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C497233.8000401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100723104733.GA12413@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 |
Christoph Hellwig put forth on 7/23/2010 5:47 AM: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:42:59AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> FWIW, for comparison, my 500GB Blue series WD5000AAKS-00V1A0 shows >> >> logical_block_size 512 >> physical_block_size 512 >> alignment_offset 0 > > Which means there is absolutely no visible 4k sector support. Sorry for the confusion Christoph. I meant for comparison to a plain old 512 byte/sec drive from the same manufacturer. The Western Digital Caviar Blue model WD5000AAKS, my drive above, has 512 byte sectors. His 2TB Caviar Green has 4096 byte sectors. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Emmanuel Florac |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |