| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfs_fsr defrag top 10% that have the largest number of extents?? |
| From: | AndCycle <andcycle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:28:14 +0800 |
| Disposition-notification-to: | AndCycle <andcycle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
my xfs_fsr version is xfsdump_2.2.48-1, there is a description in xfs_fsr man said "When invoked with no arguments xfs_fsr reorganizes all regular files in all mounted filesystems. (...)Each pass goes through and selects files that have the largest number of extents. It attempts to defragment the top 10% of these files on each pass. " but xfs_fsr -d telling me it defrags in inode ascending order, http://pastebin.com/h0RyZkwA is this a normal behavior? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't warn on EAGAIN in inode reclaim, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_fsr defrag top 10% that have the largest number of extents??, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs: don't warn on EAGAIN in inode reclaim, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr defrag top 10% that have the largest number of extents??, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |