| To: | "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:55:45 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <yq1vdd68j1w.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20100308221044.GA17830@xxxxxxx> <4B957E03.9090000@xxxxxxxxxxx> <yq1vdd68j1w.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Eric> Make sure your partitions, if any, are on 4k boundaries.(*) older > Eric> fdisk at least won't do this by default, not sure about parted. > > You can use the expert mode in fdisk to ensure that the partition begins > on a 4KB boundary. and use -u to give it sector units ... > > Eric> (*)unless the drive has an offset to make 512-sector 63 line up on > Eric> a nice boundary... in which case I guess you could experiment with > Eric> perf both ways to be sure... > > EARS is the one that's lying about the physical block size. It's > zero-aligned unless somebody messed with the jumper. Ok, that's good. Thanks Martin! -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD?, Martin K. Petersen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS hang during xfs_fsr run, Michael Weissenbacher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD?, Martin K. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: fix log filtering in 223's testcase, Dmitry Monakhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |