| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) |
| From: | Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:48:38 +0100 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100208194226.GD9527@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4AF0422D.1070104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091114162126.GB17658@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B0A8075.8080008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091211115932.GA20632@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B3F9F88.9030307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100107110446.GA13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B45CFAC.4000607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100108113114.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B504B03.7050604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B6706CE.1020207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100208194226.GD9527@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
On 8-2-2010 20:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 05:52:30PM +0100, Patrick Schreurs wrote:Hello Dave, I'm afraid we had another crash a few days ago. Have a look at the screenshot. Can you make anything out of it? This server is running 2.6.32.3 with your inode-reclaim patch applied and XFS_DEBUG still enabled.Just wondering, which set of patches is this exactly? This is a clean 2.6.32.3 with the xfs-inode-reclaim-2.6.32 patch i received from Dave on January 8th (see attachment). Thanks, -Patrick
|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 8/9] xfs: log changed inodes instead of writing them synchronously, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |