| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) |
| From: | Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:52:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4B504B03.7050604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <89c4f90c0910270341r7833f490g60810f2817eb0950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091030101601.GA11142@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AF0422D.1070104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091114162126.GB17658@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B0A8075.8080008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091211115932.GA20632@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B3F9F88.9030307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100107110446.GA13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B45CFAC.4000607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100108113114.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B504B03.7050604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
Hello Dave,I'm afraid we had another crash a few days ago. Have a look at the screenshot. Can you make anything out of it? This server is running 2.6.32.3 with your inode-reclaim patch applied and XFS_DEBUG still enabled. Thanks for looking into this. -Patrick On 15-1-2010 12:01, Patrick Schreurs wrote: Hi Dave, I think it's save to consider this issue fixed. We have currently 9 servers operational with these patches and they have been stable so far. For a 100% certainty we'll have to test/wait a little bit longer, but considering the frequency of crashes we saw earlier i think it's save to come to a conclusion. I hope these patches will be included in 2.6.33 and will be back ported to at least 2.6.32. Many thanks to Dave and to Christoph for fixing this apparently rare and seldom triggered condition. -Patrick Dave Chinner wrote:Hi Patrick, I've attached two compendium patches that will hopefully fix the inode reclaim problems you've been seeing - one is for 2.6.31, the other is for 2.6.32. I've cc'd this to the XFS list ѕo that anyone else who has been seeing crashes, assert failures and general nastiness around inode reclaim can test them as well. These are not final patches - there's a few changes that Christoph has picked up on during review - so there'll be another round of patches before checkins and -stable backports can be requested. I'm hoping that these patches fix your problem, because with them I can't make my machines fall over anymore.... Cheers, Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2/2] xfs: use scalable vmap API, Nick Piggin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Filesystem corrupted: "Sorry, could not find valid secondary superblock", Nicolas Stransky |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 2/2] xfs: use scalable vmap API, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Patrick Schreurs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |