| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: install xfs |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:09:49 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20091114173819.6a23b654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <6fccb1d70911132005x43d02e39u9f161ecbce325c61@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091114105417.29066860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091114161933.GA17658@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091114173819.6a23b654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:19:33 -0500 vous écriviez:Fedora comes with XFS included for a long time. And even RHEL5 comes with XFS kernel support, although on x86_64 and only supported if you sign over your first born to Red Hat.Wow, hell froze over. I never understood why redhat refused to include XFS for so long, and simply decided to ditch redhat and derivatives ages ago (no xfs? no mp3? grotesque rpm dependancies? you must be friggin kidding). Red Hat and Fedora can't ship the patented mp3 codec. And enterprise distributions routinely choose a subset of kernel options that they can support well for their customers. But now I'm getting OT, so probably won't reply further. :) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: install xfs, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | MSDS Compliance Tool With the Benefits of Cloud Computing, Scott Shepherd |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: install xfs, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/7] assorted cleanups, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |