| To: | Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:40:13 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <c2dcdfa40910220930l19a8dab0y88e80630a2453b39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <c2dcdfa40910202307m77a9d7c5lf18e278a9ebae08e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF2EE8.6010700@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910211032y5b1d2cd8l418491327d24b87b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF4882.70106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910220209v781f6a76u31e349ea461bc10a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE06BAE.8090706@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c2dcdfa40910220930l19a8dab0y88e80630a2453b39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) |
Amit Sahrawat wrote: > I am already using that patch. > Other than using higher XFS version, can I try any other thing? > > I cannot directly use higher XFS version, I will have to backport the > changes for higher to the kernel I am using because of dependencies. > backporting xfs would be hard; I was hoping that perhaps you could just boot a newer kernel, though I know w/ vendor arm kernels that can be tough. There are drawbacks to not getting machine support upstream... :) I don't really have other things for you to try, and don't have a lot of time to debug 3 year old kernels either... :( You could try your arm testcase in a qemu emulator on a new kernel; if that shows the same problem I'll be much more interested & motivated... -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, Amit Sahrawat |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [PATCH 13/14] repair: optimize duplicate extent tracking, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, Amit Sahrawat |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 1992 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, Amit Sahrawat |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |