| To: | XFS Development <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS corruption with failover |
| From: | John Quigley <jquigley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:44:35 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <4A84BF5A.8030502@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1405534054.1935051250211481446.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A84BF5A.8030502@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) |
Eric Sandeen wrote: Should barriers be enabled in XFS then?Could try it but I bet the iscsi target doesn't claim to support them... The target implementation, being new, is fairly naive and does not support this (or have any caching facilities, for that matter) at this time. - John Quigley |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS corruption with failover, Lachlan McIlroy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: actually issue 0 size writes, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption with failover, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption with failover, John Quigley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |