| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:05:17 -0500 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) |
Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > This looks good Eric. > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota > enforcement too? I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well. -Eric > Lachlan > > ----- "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Add some very basic quota sanity tests for generic filesystems. >> >> This is based on test 108, but uses the generic quota tools, >> not xfs_quota, and therefore cannot test project quota. >> >> Also, the IOs are much smaller (48k) so that ext3 won't get into >> indirect blocks and throw off the accounting. This does >> assume 4k blocks though. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- ... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: fix spin_is_locked assert on uni-processor builds, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests 218: very basic defragmentation testing for xfs & ext4, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |