| To: | Hendrik Hoeth <hendrik.hoeth@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: corrupt file system -- "Structure needs cleaning" |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:52:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090626212611.GI29416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090626195804.GG29416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A452CF7.3040807@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090626212611.GI29416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) |
Hendrik Hoeth wrote: > Thus spake Eric Sandeen (sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx): > >>> [14:44] root@jetway:/var/log # xfs_check /dev/mapper/hda_crypt_vg-home >> xfs_check doesn't actually fix anything; I'd run xfs_repair. Use -n >> first if you want to see what it would do. > > I thought that if xfs_check doesn't show any errors, the filesystem is > fine and doesn't need an xfs_repair. Is that wrong? Well, yes, I suppose that's true. I almost never use xfs_check mostly because it's a memory hog, still, and xfs_repair checks almost everything that xfs_check does (and what isn't checked is rebuilt anyway) > Anyway xfs_repair looks healthy to me: good news, I guess :) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: corrupt file system -- "Structure needs cleaning", Hendrik Hoeth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: corrupt file system -- "Structure needs cleaning", Hendrik Hoeth |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: corrupt file system -- "Structure needs cleaning", Hendrik Hoeth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: corrupt file system -- "Structure needs cleaning", Felix Blyakher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |