| To: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem |
| From: | Milind Dumbare <milind@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:12:22 +0530 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) |
Hi,I have heard of XFS's performance is not good as compared to EXT3 when the filesystem(disk) is 80% filled with data. Is it true? I have went through lots of performance documents of both XFS and EXT3 but could not find such performance benchmarking (for 80% full filesystems). Any numbers or pointers to other documents are appreciated. Thanks -Miline |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.30-rc5, Felix Blyakher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Sometimes df is not updated after remove within xfs via nfs., hgichon |
| Previous by Thread: | [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.30-rc5, Felix Blyakher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |