| To: | Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LWN article: ext4 and data loss |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:36:20 -0500 |
| Cc: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <49B9396D.7060809@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200903121239.35442@xxxxxx> <49B9097C.1070003@xxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20090312_151043_496061_D19DDB11) <200903121514.12732.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <49B92423.4020708@xxxxxxxxxxx> <49B9396D.7060809@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
Greg Banks wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> It's simple. Want your data safe on disk? fsync. There's not a lot >> more to it than that. (and if fsync hurts perf too much, re-think how >> you are storing your data) >> >> Filesystems can hack around some heuristics to try to make unsafe apps >> safer, but in the end, it's the app's job to make sure a buffered write >> hits permanent storage when it matters. >> > > Stewart Smith has a highly entertaining presentation on this very topic. > > http://www.linux.org.au/conf/2007/talk/278.html > and http://www.flamingspork.com/talks/2007/06/eat_my_data.odp In hindsight, http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Filesystems/reiserfs.html is entertaining, too ;) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LWN article: ext4 and data loss, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LWN article: ext4 and data loss, Greg Banks |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LWN article: ext4 and data loss, Greg Banks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LWN article: ext4 and data loss, Greg Banks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |