| To: | Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix error handling in xfs_log_mount |
| From: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:24:37 +1100 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1E52072E-CA98-430B-9B2F-FDD0FDD1A7A4@xxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI |
| References: | <20090210194422.767988000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090210194515.509547000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <A482AB92-6E29-43EA-A671-43D86E041335@xxxxxxx> <20090210195756.GA7569@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1E52072E-CA98-430B-9B2F-FDD0FDD1A7A4@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | lachlan@xxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) |
Felix Blyakher wrote: On Feb 10, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:56:31PM -0600, Felix Blyakher wrote:Isn't it a reworked Lachlan's patch: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00175.htmlThe patch isn't related to that one at all,... from the implementation point of view, yes.but it aims to fix the same issue.That's what I meant.Should probably get a Reported-by: tag for him,Seems reasonable.if this is indeed the thing the original patch tried to fix.That was my understanding. Let's Lachlan pitch in. I'd prefer both fixes go in so we have maximum defence against this problem happening again but I'm really not fussed. Felix _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Re-dirty pages on I/O error, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix error handling in xfs_log_mount, Felix Blyakher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix error handling in xfs_log_mount, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |