xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xfs-masters] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108

To: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:27:31 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-testers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a4423d670901100709v1e7ce0bfs167547c5001787ac@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090109044121.GA31280@orion> <20090109053858.GP9448@disturbed> <a4423d670901091353s7ff12207gcb38eb093d77d401@mail.gmail.com> <a4423d670901091418j5c7fdfb2oeba2f4640f8e29d0@mail.gmail.com> <a4423d670901091511y68a53808rfaab8148526224c6@mail.gmail.com> <a4423d670901100419s2ae106bexac1a538caf654153@mail.gmail.com> <20090110143924.GA25900@infradead.org> <a4423d670901100709v1e7ce0bfs167547c5001787ac@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>> How big is the filesystem where you see this corruption? Maybe I could
>> reproduce it locally with a xfs_metadump image.
> 
> They are big enough, I have four such FS's for >200Gb

An xfs_metadump should not be so large, though.

But bisecting as hch suggested (keepin the "working" header for each
bisection point) would be great.

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>