| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 00/12] [PATCH V2]: compat ioctl fixes/cleanups/additions |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:40:27 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <20081126032005.639750968@sandeen.net> |
| References: | <20081126032005.639750968@sandeen.net> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) |
sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Latest installation, incorporating hch's comments. > > Which is to say, a lot changed. :) > > -Eric Just a note, Christoph reviewed & acked all these after I posted them. The list ate the replies, it seems, so it'd be hard for anyone to know. At best they are delayed by 4 hours. I checked the archives at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-11/index.html but even my original thread is missing there (no email past Nov 24). Same for here, http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2008-November/ ends on Nov 12. So it's hard to know if it made it anywhere. Is the best practice now to cc: LKML or linux-fsdevel so that email is more certain to be delivered to some endpoint? -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Extreme slowness with xfs [WAS: Re: Slowness with new pc], Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 00/12] [PATCH V2]: compat ioctl fixes/cleanups/additions, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 03/12] Clean up some existing compat ioctl calls, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 00/12] [PATCH V2]: compat ioctl fixes/cleanups/additions, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |