xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [PATCH] xfs: Abort intent log item in xfs_iflush() upon error to get

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] xfs: Abort intent log item in xfs_iflush() upon error to get buf
From: Shyam Kaushik <shyam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:32:23 +0530
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zadarastorage-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4tQwv2LCOfzg+XuM1tEeuKYbsvJg7g4PV6gQhqt+Srs=; b=qUziRGNdwg9wo0cPsejx132rLimltD/uBN+CWaP9kMw/iFlezLjOCMpjJx8T7YDR33 J0dIyJcqq7iGM5/u7Xn5sFvMtur4ozatJ+QsJSfyPrVF4esPnvuDJBTsEf6wMR4Czlhi koC8/81a3kKDAJSNRhQg2LrwWkaKFV059C+DbL7F+O40AP/y2wSRvUz6tu6/Zpy2Pke0 kvbsH5jat1smQB2HpRvI3HLFplQUYEJk9HbfaIFinbA0bPTOHd/0ZscH6jkeJFqlA9DU XrV4XmmyM8akfIAYMOesHrADn9fRsHGPj3dyoihPfHuizD7qPw4+FP6vyqMXmCxlGU+I jMHg==
In-reply-to: <20160412211619.GK567@dastard>
References: <23e35813cb097c7b15686852500cbf97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160412082759.GI9088@dastard> <5e9c99552ae829dce9eb574d72085323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160412211619.GK567@dastard>
Thread-index: AdGVAJAQ7GnG9mKQR2WkASXG2AnF9wAOIsAw
Thanks Dave.

You are right that xfs_trans_read_buf_map() is initializing it but
xfs_imap_to_bp() being in the middle spoils it by passing its own local
bp.

--Shyam

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Chinner [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 April 2016 02:46
To: Shyam Kaushik
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Abort intent log item in xfs_iflush() upon error
to get buf

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:10:13PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Your patch needs a minor correction.
>
> At start of xfs_iflush() either we must initialize "bp = NULL" or else
> xfs_imap_to_bp() when it hits an error need to set "*bpp = NULL".
> Otherwise with your patch we are having an uninitialized bp that
> corrupt_out is trying to do xfs_buf_relse().

Ok, I'll check that - I thought that xfs_trans_buf_read_map() was
initialising it to zero appropriately, but obviously I missed
something.

Thanks for testing!

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>