xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: linux-next: left over things in linux-next after 2.6.28-c1

from [Lachlan McIlroy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: left over things in linux-next after 2.6.28-c1
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:44:06 +1100
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081026083939.GA19394@infradead.org>
References: <20081026005009.50dbbb33.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081026081717.GB20872@infradead.org> <20081026193421.f5f7d8f1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081026083939.GA19394@infradead.org>
Reply-to: lachlan@xxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:34:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: 
Presumably what was merged was slightly different (or the commits were
split up differently).  This is the same problem I have with the kvm tree.


It should be the same, but the xfs trees have been a bit of a maze
recently, so it shouldn't be a surprise that your list got out of sync.


The XFS tree used for linux-next got a bit out of whack and I couldn't make
sense of the mess so I've been using a different tree for the mainline pull
requests.  We'll have this mess sorted out soon.


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  TAKE 987246 - correctly select first log item to push, Lachlan McIlroy
Next by Date:  Предлагаем информационные базы данных, hagan dawit
Previous by Thread:  Re: linux-next: left over things in linux-next after 2.6.28-c1, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:  [PATCH 1/2] wire up ->open for directories, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]