| To: | Muhammad Fakhrul Rozi Bin Mohd Seth <rozi@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS slow performance |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:57:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <48FBED80.60604@ramunia.com> |
| References: | <48FBDC47.5080700@ramunia.com> <48FBEBFA.30200@sandeen.net> <48FBED80.60604@ramunia.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) |
Muhammad Fakhrul Rozi Bin Mohd Seth wrote: > Thanks for the reply; No problem; please keep the list on cc: so that others with similar problems will have something to find on google :) > Yes i have test the other's and it is more worst than XFS. > So here the snapshot is provide by the LVM not the XFS itself? That's right; xfs itself has no snapshot capability. It's done at the block layer (via lvm in your case). > Have face any issue on snapshot using LVM before? I don't use snapshots much so can't say, but they do have overhead. You may have more luck asking for suggestions on the lvm users list. There might be some tuning you can do. -Eric > Regards > Rozi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS slow performance, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Re: another problem with latest code drops, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS slow performance, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Undeliverable mail: Предложение услуг по сертификации продукции, MAILER-DAEMON |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |