xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: TAKE 957103 - Merge up to 2.6.27-rc8

from [Lachlan McIlroy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 957103 - Merge up to 2.6.27-rc8
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:39:55 +1000
Cc: sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081003195141.GA18988@infradead.org>
References: <20081003031258.7886658C52B4@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20081003091001.GA11627@infradead.org> <20081003195141.GA18988@infradead.org>
Reply-to: lachlan@xxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 05:10:01AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: 
So this patch now has made it out to the CVS on oss, but not the actual
update of the surrouding kernel tree.  Any chance to fix that before the
weekend so we'll actually have a tree the builds?


Ok, everything is fine now.  Looks like the ptools to cvs push being
fragile as usual..


Both changes (ie fs/xfs and everything else) went in at the same time.
Probably just ptools congestion.


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  xfs_admin -U generate, Carolyn Knox
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] XFS: Check for valid transaction headers in recovery, Lachlan McIlroy
Previous by Thread:  Re: TAKE 957103 - Merge up to 2.6.27-rc8, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:  Re: TAKE 957103 - Merge up to 2.6.27-rc8, Russell Cattelan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]