Re: [PATCH v2] Use atomic_t and wait_event to track dquot pincount

[Peter Leckie <pleckie@xxxxxxx>]

Dave Chinner wrote:
> but it doesn't fix the underlying problem that was causing the
> spurious wakeups, which is the fact that xfs_qm_dqflush() is not
> obeying non-blocking flush directions. The patch below should fix
> that. Can you please test it before you add your patch?
>   
Yeah I already had this idea I  just have not posted a patch because 
Lachlan though
it might introduce a deadlock. If you think this is a good Idea I will 
update my patch
to  be non blocking.