Re: [PATCH] Don't release root inode until finished using it

xfs

To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Don't release root inode until finished using it
From:	Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:32:51 +1000
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<20080806000116.GA15930@infradead.org>
References:	<4897F434.2010309@sgi.com> <20080806000116.GA15930@infradead.org>
Reply-to:	lachlan@xxxxxxx
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)

Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Looks good, but I've already sent a nicer version on the 26th:

[PATCH 1/6] move root inode IRELE into xfs_unmountfs


Sometimes I wish people would at least glance over my patches when they
hit the list..


Some of us are trying to fix bugs and don't have time to look at every
cleanup patch that hits the list.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Don't release root inode until finished using it, Lachlan McIlroy Re: [PATCH] Don't release root inode until finished using it, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH] Don't release root inode until finished using it, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] Don't release root inode until finished using it, Lachlan McIlroy <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] Move vn_iowait() earlier in the reclaim path, Lachlan McIlroy
Next by Date:	TAKE 981498 - replace dquot flush semaphore with a completion, Lachlan McIlroy
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] Don't release root inode until finished using it, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] Move vn_iowait() earlier in the reclaim path, Lachlan McIlroy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]