| To: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:22:40 -0500 |
| Cc: | Richard Ems <Richard.Ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Bill O'Donnell" <billodo@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4885C425.9020309@sgi.com> |
| References: | <4880AEF8.2080906@cape-horn-eng.com> <48815AA6.3080102@sgi.com> <4884B419.6080603@thebarn.com> <488552EC.8060803@sgi.com> <4885BB2E.3010508@cape-horn-eng.com> <4885C425.9020309@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Mark Goodwin wrote: > > Richard Ems wrote: >> When can we *expect* to have these patches backported? In one month? >> Three months? More? > > For SLES, within a week. For OpenSuSE presumeably the SLES folks will > follow-up with OpenSuSE, but I can't predict when. For Fedora, Eric > Sandeen. For RHEL (on anything except SGI storage platforms), nobody > since XFS is not supported directly by Redhat. Nor even shipped with RHEL. But hopefully the CentOS guys will pick it up, I'll give them a heads up when the list of fixes appears. Thanks, -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsrestore over ssh?, Richard Hartmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] XFS: Use the inode tree for finding dirty inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Fw: TV pela Internet, Maria Ap. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |