| To: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes) |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:45:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4851E774.2070401@sgi.com> |
| References: | <484B15A3.4030505@sauce.co.nz> <484CA425.3080606@sandeen.net> <484DDDB3.70000@sgi.com> <484F0998.90306@sauce.co.nz> <484F2CD7.9070506@sgi.com> <484F452A.8090909@sandeen.net> <48512A34.1020604@sandeen.net> <4851CD32.7080106@melbourne.sgi.com> <4851E774.2070401@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Mark Goodwin wrote: > struct dirent has an embedded ino_t too, so for completeness we should also > be looking for readdir(), readdir64(), getdirentries(), > getdirentries64(), etc. *sigh* >>> I'm going to see if I can't leverage Fedora to clean some of this up. >>> >>> -Eric >>> >> Good luck with that. > > Yes good luck :) > (and the plan for statically linked apps? ...) I plan to encourage fedora to keep discouraging them ;) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes), Greg Banks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes), Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes), Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Linux MD RAID 5 Benchmarks Across (3 to 10) 300 Gigabyte Veliciraptors, David Lethe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |