xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes)

To: markgw@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:45:12 -0500
Cc: Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4851E774.2070401@sgi.com>
References: <484B15A3.4030505@sauce.co.nz> <484CA425.3080606@sandeen.net> <484DDDB3.70000@sgi.com> <484F0998.90306@sauce.co.nz> <484F2CD7.9070506@sgi.com> <484F452A.8090909@sandeen.net> <48512A34.1020604@sandeen.net> <4851CD32.7080106@melbourne.sgi.com> <4851E774.2070401@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
Mark Goodwin wrote:

> struct dirent has an embedded ino_t too, so for completeness we should also
> be looking for readdir(), readdir64(), getdirentries(), 
> getdirentries64(), etc.

*sigh*

>>> I'm going to see if I can't leverage Fedora to clean some of this up.
>>>
>>> -Eric
>>>
>> Good luck with that.
> 
> Yes good luck :)
> (and the plan for statically linked apps? ...)

I plan to encourage fedora to keep discouraging them ;)

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>