xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: SB validate failed

To: Spam Magnet <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS: SB validate failed
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:08:42 +1000
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3607657a0805301019h4a49dc86ne8f1f019629a1c41@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3607657a0805291005k457791cej1c5f867da0f95965@mail.gmail.com> <483EE5BD.8020407@sandeen.net> <3607657a0805291255i59fd006fi9d6836cf528d19a6@mail.gmail.com> <483F0BC3.2050901@sandeen.net> <3607657a0805291400h3c50165lea6fbea919deed0f@mail.gmail.com> <483F1AED.3010808@sandeen.net> <3607657a0805291446t79808c63l664780c1cbc3d871@mail.gmail.com> <483F907A.3020108@sgi.com> <3607657a0805301019h4a49dc86ne8f1f019629a1c41@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
Spam Magnet wrote:
>> As Eric said.
>> We chose the ondisk format to have the byte ordering of IRIX so
>> it should not be a problem. However, parts of the log code in Linux
>> does not do the necessary endian conversion (due to lack of info at
>> the relevant points - it only knows as blobs of data) and so you
>> need the log to be clean. i.e. byte ordering problem just for the log.
>>
> 
> Thanks for this info, it's good to have 1 less problem to worry about :)
> 
>> OOI, as Eric asked, how were you able to mount it all of a sudden?
>>
> 
> I am not sure, as I said, to narrow down the problem I am experiencing
> with other disks, I decided to format an empty, healthy disk under Irix and
> try to mount it under Linux. The first try was not successful but the
> second was.
> 
> Right now I am making an image of the good/healthy disk using dd to
> see if I can mount that
> image under Linux. (It's not fun to copy 2GB disks through a
> USB1.1-SCSI adapter :)

:-)
If the fs is not too full then xfs_copy would be good I suppose as
it won't copy freespace.

--Tim


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>