| To: | Spam Magnet <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 May 2008 15:02:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3607657a0805291255i59fd006fi9d6836cf528d19a6@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <3607657a0805291005k457791cej1c5f867da0f95965@mail.gmail.com> <483EE5BD.8020407@sandeen.net> <3607657a0805291255i59fd006fi9d6836cf528d19a6@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Spam Magnet wrote: > So can this be related to the byte ordering or any of the other > issues mentioned in the FAQ regarding xfs under Linux ? > How can I figure out if my disk is using XLV or is a v2 directory ? Byte ordering is only an issue for the log replay; you'd get a message about that if it were the issue. Does file -s /dev/sdb? say that any of those things even look like an xfs filesystem? If so point xfs_db at it like: xfs_db -r -c "sb 0" -c "p" /dev/sdb<whatever> that'll tell you if it has v1 dirs I think. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |