| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2) |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 May 2008 10:31:01 -0500 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@xxxxxxxxxxx>, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080513092851.GA19879@infradead.org> |
| References: | <4828CAC6.3090402@unixsol.org> <48292742.8090409@sgi.com> <482951C3.60600@unixsol.org> <20080513090311.GZ155679365@sgi.com> <20080513092156.GA26736@infradead.org> <20080513092851.GA19879@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 05:21:56AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Well, we could refcount the number of active xfs instances and >> start/stop the global threads based on that. Not really worth my >> time IHMO, but if someone comes up with a clean enough patch it should >> go in. > > Actually doing it in the VFS might be even better. Add ->init and > ->exit methods to struct file_system_type and then the filesystems can > move most of module_init/exit into the new methods. Hmm I like that idea! :) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2), Lennart Sorensen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] re-remove xfs custom bitops, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2), Lennart Sorensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |