| To: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc() |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:32:05 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1209341212.23166.122.camel@edge.scott.net.au> |
| References: | <200804261651.02078.vda.linux__2040.04651536724$1209223026$gmane$org@googlemail.com> <87iqy4wfjq.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080426200701.GA10883@infradead.org> <20080426202630.GG17905@one.firstfloor.org> <20080426202323.GA14245@infradead.org> <1209341212.23166.122.camel@edge.scott.net.au> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911) |
> Having to compile chunks of XFS code in both kernel and > userspace is also wierd (relative to other drivers), Perhaps it would be a good idea to mark the files where that is expected to work clearly. > and > its a side-effect of needing to do that (all the code > dealing with specifics of ondisk format is shared). But does that really need "STATIC"? Seems doubtful to me. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | [RFC PATCH 1/3] Implement generic freeze feature, Takashi Sato |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RFC PATCH 2/3] Remove XFS specific ioctl interfaces for freeze feature, Takashi Sato |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |