| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] fix attr fit checking for filesystems which have lost their attr2 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:45:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <47F035E3.1030004@sgi.com> |
| References: | <47EDCBF9.4070102@sandeen.net> <47F035E3.1030004@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) |
Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Eric Sandeen wrote: ... >> My understanding of this is that if di_forkoff is non-zero, >> we should always be using it for space calculations, regardless >> of whether we are mounted with attr2 or not... >> > That was my understanding as well. > I'll have a look at the code soon and see if I can > see any problems with the change and the consistency > of it all. > > Thanks a bunch, > Tim. Thanks. FWIW, if I install F8 with bona-fide attr2 in effect, with selinux (so attrs on everything) and then update it while mounted as an attr1 filesystem, with this patch in place, it does not result in anything bad as far as xfs_repair can see. (and it's a big update, probably touching most files...) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] fix attr fit checking for filesystems which have lost their attr2, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | メール送信エラー通知, au one net |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] fix attr fit checking for filesystems which have lost their attr2, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] fix attr fit checking for filesystems which have lost their attr2, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |