Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:48:29PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> When xfs_mountfs is called by xfs_mount xfs_readsb was called 35 lines
>> above unconditionally, so there is no need to try to read the superblock
>> if it's not present. If any other port doesn't have the superblock
>> read at this point it should just call it directly from it's xfs_mount
>> equivalent.
>
> Ping?
Looks good, will be in shortly.
Don
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c 2007-12-17 14:34:57.000000000
>> +0100
>> +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c 2007-12-17 14:35:17.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -968,11 +968,6 @@ xfs_mountfs(
>> int uuid_mounted = 0;
>> int error = 0;
>>
>> - if (mp->m_sb_bp == NULL) {
>> - error = xfs_readsb(mp, mfsi_flags);
>> - if (error)
>> - return error;
>> - }
>> xfs_mount_common(mp, sbp);
>>
>> /*
> ---end quoted text---
>
|