xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.25-rc4

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.25-rc4
From: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:41:48 +1100
Cc: lachlan@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47C79BD8.4050708@sandeen.net>
Organization: SGI Engineering
References: <20080229035000.7B24058C4C0F@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <47C78629.104@sandeen.net> <47C79078.4070504@sgi.com> <47C79BD8.4050708@sandeen.net>
Reply-to: markgw@xxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210)


Eric Sandeen wrote:
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
    git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus

This will update the following files:

 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c |   14 +++++++-------
 fs/xfs/xfs_clnt.h            |    2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c          |    2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h           |    2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c          |    4 ++--
 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

through these commits:

commit b7405bb65a83e819dd3b21a6d9636c279d9ce79a
Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
um, I thought Jeff wrote that patch.
I'm sure he did too.  Every now and then our ptools -> git merge tools stuff up.


IMHO it's worth finding out why; authorship should not be taken lightly.

-Eric

yes I agree. Niv's take: Inspected by: bnaujok,jeffpc and no Signed-off

Lachlan, would that have confused the scripts?

--

 Mark Goodwin                                  markgw@xxxxxxx
 Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP    Phone: +61-3-99631937
 SGI Australian Software Group           Cell: +61-4-18969583
-------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>