| To: | eric c <xcellula@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is CVS stable? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:13:12 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <eb736a810802200026g1b956abar922548d3e67a9682@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <eb736a810802200026g1b956abar922548d3e67a9682@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) |
eric c wrote: > Hello, > > I have recently seen some patches for slabcache related > xfs_inode/xfs_vnode_t/dentry_cache taking up alot of memory: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00154.html > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00138.html > > If I cvs on linux-2.6-xfs, is it stable for production or bleeding? I'd never consider any cvs head as "stable for production" That said, the xfs cvs tree is probably one of the more stable bleeding-edge trees you'll find. ;) -Eric > Thanks > eric c > xcellula@xxxxxxxxx > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] Prevent excessive xfsaild wakeups, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] Prevent excessive xfsaild wakeups, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is CVS stable?, Klaus Strebel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is CVS stable?, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |