xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch

To: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:29:25 -0600
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080121051341.GA31708862@melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <4794159F.9070505@sandeen.net> <20080121051341.GA31708862@melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
Niv Sardi wrote:
> * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-01-20 21:46:39 -0600]:
> 
>> Index: xfsprogs-2.9.4/growfs/xfs_growfs.c
>> ===================================================================
> [...]
>> couple things... you lost a "\n" off the end of the data section there...
> 
> That has been fixed, I guess it needs to be sent to oss  (barry?)

Ok, see that.  Sorry... grabbed the original patch and didn't check cvs
for updates.

Thanks,
-Eric

>> Also, do you really want to drop reporting of unwritten extents?  Even
>> if you're disallowing the selection on new mkfs's there may still be
>> different flavors of filesystems in existence, should it still be reported?
> 
> I don't really care, whatever the oss/xfs-master people like best.
> 
> Cheers


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>