xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] XFS bitops to Linux again

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS bitops to Linux again
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:11:13 -0500
Cc: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200710041014.22936.ak@suse.de>
References: <200710040027.16926.ak@suse.de> <60338.192.168.3.1.1191452291.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <200710041014.22936.ak@suse.de>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Andi Kleen wrote:

>> To be honest, this sounds like just code churn and risk 
>> introduction.
> 
> Ok I got the message. I retract the patch. Sorry for bothering you
> with lowly cleanups.
> 
> -Andi

Hrmph.  I liked it.  Every change has risk but why bother duplicating
existing kernel infrastructure?  Compared to everything else going on
lately this hardly seems worth NAKing.  (though I'm sure the same
complaint/warning/caution could be leveled at the other boatload of
changes in the past month).

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>